• Hi Guest!

    We are extremely excited to announce the release of our first Beta1.1 and the first release of our Public AddonKit!
    To participate in the Beta, a subscription to the Entertainer or Creator Tier is required. For access to the Public AddonKit you must be a Creator tier member. Once subscribed, download instructions can be found here.

    Click here for information and guides regarding the VaM2 beta. Join our Discord server for more announcements and community discussion about VaM2.
  • Hi Guest!

    VaM2 Resource Categories have now been added to the Hub! For information on posting VaM2 resources and details about VaM2 related changes to our Community Forums, please see our official announcement here.

Is pre-processing of the "addonpackages" folder possible to speed startup?

DJ

Well-known member
Wiki Contributor
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
796
Solutions
21
Reactions
635
I just did some testing. A stock version of VaM (with no custom content added) loads in 16 seconds on my computer. If I copy over my 31GB addonPackages directory, load time increases to 41 seconds. People with slower systems are reporting it can take several minutes to start up.

I imagine that this delay is caused by Vam having to look through all the var files, extracting morphs, clothes, hairstyles, etc, and adding them to their various menus. Would it be possible to pre-process the addonpackages directory so this doesn't have to be done from scratch every time VaM starts? Maybe add it to the cache?
 
Last edited:
Not the answer your looking for, but I timed startup for desktop and VR you are right it dose make a difference.
empty addonPackages folder time is 10 sec
44GB addonPackages folder time 20 sec
 
get a m.2 hard drive and all your loading problems will be solved
I have one, and count myself lucky my load time is under a minute, while others wait 2 or 3 minutes. But in any case, a doubling or tripling of a users startup time would be a nice thing to avoid if it were possible. Look at the huge performance boost we got from texture caching!
 
Well, i have an m.2 too, but i also got 165 gb of vars. Let me assure you: Nothing is solved - i know things would be even worse with an ssd or even hdd. Still looking desperately for a solution. Thought, i found one with FasterVAM, but in my case, it is completely unreliable.
 
Back
Top Bottom