• Hi Guest!

    We are extremely excited to announce the release of our first Beta1.1 and the first release of our Public AddonKit!
    To participate in the Beta, a subscription to the Entertainer or Creator Tier is required. For access to the Public AddonKit you must be a Creator tier member. Once subscribed, download instructions can be found here.

    Click here for information and guides regarding the VaM2 beta. Join our Discord server for more announcements and community discussion about VaM2.
  • Hi Guest!

    VaM2 Resource Categories have now been added to the Hub! For information on posting VaM2 resources and details about VaM2 related changes to our Community Forums, please see our official announcement here.

Stars rounding

Acid Bubbles

Invaluable member
Developer
Featured Contributor
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
1,406
Solutions
10
Reactions
5,906
It's been a while and I really didn't want to make a fuss because, you know, it's not that important... but I think rounding may be better than flooring here :)

1596250859281.png


I knoooow I'm being self centered and all, but I felt that I may not be the only one who got a 4 stars review and went "nooooooooo!"
 
I have just created a new addon for this system that changes the rounding by 0.25. So now 4.75 and above is considered 5 stars. 4.25-4.74 is 4.5 stars. 3.75-4.24 is 4 stars, etc.
 
Hahaha I feel like a crybaby for raising this, but thanks :D
 
As a consumer not a creator I feel like low reviews on FREE stuff are BS. Send the author a constructive neg comment or forum type post if you want but a low review seems harsh. Anyway @Acid Bubbles that leash one is 5 stars now :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If a review is really unfair it can be reported and removed if needed. There have been a couple cases of this already. One reviewer just spammed a bunch of content just because it was futa. That person received a warning.
 
Not exactly the same thing, but more or less related :

When you click the "top resources" title, I noticed that the "average top score" is based on the review, not an aggregation or some kind of average on the review + (positive) reactions.

I can take Auto pupils as an example. The resource as a lot of reactions but not so much reviews. The result is that the resource may be way lower than any other resource that has almost no reaction but 2 or 3 more reviews.

I think some users are way too lazy to put a review and are dropping a reaction instead. At some point I think it would be wiser to take both into account in the top resources page :)
 
Back
Top Bottom