VaM 1.x var is not named with convention <creator>.<name>.<version>

[Okachu]

I know the error but what is wrong with these names?


creator.name_asset.1.1.var is not named with convention <creator>.<name>.<version>

c_creator.name_A.1.1.var is not named with convention <creator>.<name>.<version>

 

[atani]

.1.1
should be .1

 

[hazmhox]

If it's a package you're creating :

• Avoid special chars at all costs for the package name, only use : lower or uppercase letters, eventually separator - or _
• Numbers are ok if its the title, don't add the version number
• I know I said non special chars, but out of safety : No accents ( àéè... ), no / \, no [ | ] and all that stuff.
• If you're a cyrillic / asian person, avoid using your character set and stick to standard letters ( as these language encoding is not that stable )

 

[Okachu]

thx, the errors are gone! No, It's not a package from me.
I hope the files still working now.

Ok, one left error:

creator.name77_name.var

should I rename it to creator.name_name.var

or creator.name77name.var

because numbers are ok in the title?

 

[hazmhox]

Always : creator . packagename . version .var
... dots being mandatory.

So, these below are all valid examples :

• hazmhox.mypackage.1.var
• hazmhox.mypackage101.1.var
• 666hazmhox.101mypackage.1.var
• HazMhox.MyPackage.1.var
• hazmhox.My_Package_101.1.var

These below are invalid:

• hazmhoxbeds1.var
• hazmhox.beds1.var
• hazmhox.beds.test.var
• [hazmhox].[beds].1.var
• etc...

 

[hazmhox]

Also, remember : if package is not named as expected, it will fail if it's used as a dependency.

 

[Okachu]

Also, remember : if package is not named as expected, it will fail if it's used as a dependency.

Ah this one had no version number, true.

But if I renamed the files, it's counting again? Or do I have to redirect the files?