Thank you for listening. I def support the idea of your next series!
Remember this isnt a criticism or a complaint about your look which is lovely..but a suggestion from a user.
Think about it this way....I am a user.
I represent someone who is interested in your work and im a highly experienced vam user so if I download something and its not quite as it looked... its jarring , especially in vr and all this is about respect for all our time.
Youre not alone in this and your perspective is def a valid one... but so is mine and i am the user you are targetting , who actually takes time to look at what theyre rating (not always the case).
I only approach you with a view to helping you streamline your process ....which youve already admitted will be happening on the next set etc. This is less about you and more about VAM right now haha its a little wild wild west!
I am a prolific reviewer of vam material. I dont have time to use it lol but i take time to look at most things and give a little feedback if i like what i see or there are serious issues. And yes I was clearly able to make your look like the one in the photos you are using up front.
As you are not alone here ..this is what I show creators , as they might not be aware just how confusing vam can be when a creator looks at the PC page while the user often looks at the internal vam software resource hub.
Remember this is about the way you present your work to users and not the excellent base look.
View attachment 62752
As you can see you have the very best version of the look which despite being confusing for many makes perfect sense as you want people to click.
But then we have this as a representation of what the user will get if they download.
And downloading and setting up a look on most pc , especially in vr takes alot of time haha
View attachment 62753
As you can see the only visible images on the screen are all of the very best version of your look which uses paid assets i believe (?) and a fair amount of work to reach the very look the user was effectively sold on.
Consider users want the look you're showing...as that is what attracts most users. Also consider that despite you clearly stating that its just the basics...many vam users dont speak good english or any english or simply dont read haha (how low the bar is set).
And end of the day, here is your actual look....
View attachment 62763
Is this so bad as the avatar and main image? that it couldnt be the main image? I think it looks great and leaves zero confusion for a user and no need to tinker to reach effectively another look entirely.
Ofcourse this is all free....and people can read...and scroll lol and edit a base look etc. ...but pls consider the above and how jarring in VR it can be on all and any look ...if what is shown is not quite what a user ends up with...
View attachment 62761View attachment 62762
Just ideas for your consideration moving forward ?
Thank you for taking the time to listen.
I give you 4 stars for the base....5 if it looked liked the marketing material and as always thank you so much for sharing.