Benchmark Result Discussion

[Seraphim]

Looking at moving from 7800x3d/4080 Super to something like one of 9800/9900/9950x3d and a 5090 but a little undecided on the CPU side on which to go for (which would actually improve the numbers for VAM the most?)
Curious to see if anyone has a performed a similar upgrade and what the increases were, hoping a lot better performance with VR (quest 3 with VD)

Not much difference from 7800x3d to 9800x3d. Just upgrade to 5090 for 50% increase and wait on cpu.

 

[vamp3003]

Pulled the trigger on both 9800/5090, seems like in some games there is quite a jump from the 7800 but I just realised I have an Asrock motherboard so... yeah... pray for me

 

[sadsadbear]

No one with a 5060Ti 16GB here...?

 

[andmusic]

Thanks for the super-detailed overview. You've somewhat alleviated my biggest bellyache: "worse VR support than Nvidia".

I'm currently running a Quest 1 with a Radeon 5700XT and the Q1 and the Navi1 combo locked me out of nearly all performance-enhancing (VR) technologies that made newer card/goggle combos even more performant - so I want to make sure I'm not making the same mistake again

Anything you think is important to know wrt FSR3.1 vs DLSS 3/4 in VR?

9070XT NOT GOOD FOR VR FOR SURE~

use cable PCVR let my Q3 has distotion of video in the lens (GTX 1060 6G without this issue) I CAN'Y FIX THIS ISSUE

But good in VD~ godlike mode~

AMD can't run the Voxta_AI, Voxta need CUDA to run~

Goddamm the NVIDEA messup the market~ push me to pickup the AMD~

 

[andmusic]

9070XT NOT GOOD FOR VR FOR SURE~

use cable PCVR let my Q3 has distotion of video in the lens (GTX 1060 6G without this issue) I CAN'Y FIX THIS ISSUE

But good in VD~ godlike mode~

AMD can't run the Voxta_AI, Voxta need CUDA to run~

Goddamm the NVIDEA messup the market~ push me to pickup the AMD~

Anyone have a 9070xt to test yet?

 

[sadsadbear]

9070XT NOT GOOD FOR VR FOR SURE~

use cable PCVR let my Q3 has distotion of video in the lens (GTX 1060 6G without this issue) I CAN'Y FIX THIS ISSUE

But good in VD~ godlike mode~

AMD can't run the Voxta_AI, Voxta need CUDA to run~

Goddamm the NVIDEA messup the market~ push me to pickup the AMD~

Until AMD can come up with a solution that can fuck NVIDIA up the same way they fucked Intel in the CPU segment, we're stuck paying for Jen-Hsun Hwang's new designer black jacket.

 

[Fferrett]

Very happy with performance. This should hold me until Vam 2.0 Releases in 2030.

ASUS TUF OC RTX 5080, AMD Ryzen 9 7900 X3D, Asus TUF Gaming X670E Plus, 64GB DDR5, CPU Fix applied for threading.

 

[Seraphim]

Very happy with performance. This should hold me until Vam 2.0 Releases in 2030.

ASUS TUF OC RTX 5080, AMD Ryzen 9 7900 X3D, Asus TUF Gaming X670E Plus, 64GB DDR5, CPU Fix applied for threading.

View attachment 490329

may I ask why you got the worser x3d chip for gaming?

 

[Seraphim]

How come im barely getting any fps on a 5090!?

 

[GenericUsername1]

How come im barely getting any fps on a 5090!?

One thing I notice when comparing your results versus mine is that you have a very high PhysicsTime. Could be something CPU-related; try disabling PBO and all other OC-related settings, benchmark with a clean VaM install, check system load etc etc.
Your benchmarking resolution is also very high, that limits the ability to compare the results to others. Not sure how a high resolution affects e.g. PhysicsTime.

 

[MacGruber]

@Seraphim @suprtt
Please stop posting results from a modified Benchmark under "Official Benchmark". If you want to modify it...sure, change the title to "Seraphim's Benchmark" or whatever and the color for "Overall Result" should be something other than green and red, too. It should be obvious when scrolling through the thread that your results are not comparable. Because just running "Baseline 3" will NOT get you reliable results, the scene is too short for heat to become an issue. Warmup is crucial. And no one know what else you might have modified.

 

[Seraphim]

Oh ok will just post basic benchmark then. was just having some 16k meme fun since the thread was dead.

 

[Seraphim]

Got a 5090 so here are my results. I moved from a 4080 super previously which was good, but left some to be desired and wasn't allowing me to run Voxta well with Vam. I've been able to max out everything, but FPS in scenes so far hasn't been mind blowing (needs more testing). Curious what others are seeing as my 5090 barely runs at 40% most of the time.

I tried a few things for each of them I did the OSW disable, turned off in Steam, and turned off VD ASW. confirmed i was seeing 130-150fps in a scene.

ALERT: Just an FYI as I was an idiot and you might be too. I ran 3dMark and got a depressing score originally. Looked online and someone mentioned doing a clean install of drivers even though I had latest. Figured wth and saw a 25% increase in score and was over average without any overclocking or anything. So definitely do this. was in the high 11k range and went up to almost 15k. 3dmark demo.

First, VirtualDesktop ran directly in VD no steam. not sure why it says rift, but on Quest 3.
View attachment 477816

How did you uncap your framerate above 120 fps on the one that says Rift?

 

[MacGruber]

Oh ok will just post basic benchmark then. was just having some 16k meme fun since the thread was dead.

And yes....I know the Benchmark is not really suited anymore for current high-end PCs. The proper way to do it would be adding new, more demanding scenes and add a separate "high-end mode" that just runs those. But I don't have the time. Can't just take any existing scene, it has to be reliable and deterministic without any random elements