Ah... I'm now trying to learn triggers... but I hate to say this, I think I'm missing like the very first concept somewhere. I can't even do the very basic "If/then" concept.
I have a community asset atom and a default person atom. the Community asset is the flamey-firey assetbundle- I'm using the "explosion of light.prefab" for this.
Now, I've loaded up the person with the "E-motion" asset, and all I want to do is set it so every time HER state goes to "inquisitive", the Community Asset does the "explosion of light.prefab" function.
I think I'm just having a problem with terminology... because I see "Receiver atom" and "Target" but that seems to be referring to the atom it's on... not the atom I want to ACT upon.
I have logic bricks, but that, too, seems to be setting up on the atom it's on. How do I make this happen:
"If "Person" State is "Inquisitive" then set "CustomAsset" to "Explosion of Light"."
I don't even know which Atom to put the logic brick in...
Anyone want to help me out? I watched a few YT vids on triggers, but again that seemed to be on the person acting upon... or else I completely misunderstood (Which is entirely possible). Thanks folks!
I have a community asset atom and a default person atom. the Community asset is the flamey-firey assetbundle- I'm using the "explosion of light.prefab" for this.
Now, I've loaded up the person with the "E-motion" asset, and all I want to do is set it so every time HER state goes to "inquisitive", the Community Asset does the "explosion of light.prefab" function.
I think I'm just having a problem with terminology... because I see "Receiver atom" and "Target" but that seems to be referring to the atom it's on... not the atom I want to ACT upon.
I have logic bricks, but that, too, seems to be setting up on the atom it's on. How do I make this happen:
"If "Person" State is "Inquisitive" then set "CustomAsset" to "Explosion of Light"."
I don't even know which Atom to put the logic brick in...
Anyone want to help me out? I watched a few YT vids on triggers, but again that seemed to be on the person acting upon... or else I completely misunderstood (Which is entirely possible). Thanks folks!