No i have not been but if mini tyrants like members of the brainwashed hive mind had their way it certainly would be, the whole reason for giving bad reviews because i do not think the same way as them is to discourage others from viewing the scene, that is as form of soft censorship, if you do not understand that i think you should try to educate yourself.
So because they do not like the way i think and they give bad reviews because of the way i think you think that is a fair way to review a scene, very strange mentality.
Sorry to rain on your persecution complex, but as a moderator here, I suppose that makes me one of the "Mini tyrant members of the brainwashed hive mind" who does not think the way you do. And I never considered removing your post.
What I *have* removed, many times, is reviews based on personal animus, rather than scene contents. Because reviews are supposed to be about the scene, not the scene creator. However, that's not the situation here. Those bad reviews weren't about "the way you think". They were based on what you, as a creator, chose to put in your scene. Clearly, Vam users don't like people proselytizing conspiracy theories in their scenes. And they are just as free to express that opinion as you are to express yours.
You seem very fond of telling people they need to educate themselves. Well, I'd suggest you eductate *yourself* about what censorship and free speech actually are. Because I think those words do not mean what you think they mean. Specifically,
freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences. If you want to plaster your scene with conspiracy theories, you're free to do so. And if people want to complain about it, they are free to do so. That's free speech in action.
Frankly, the idea that someone publishing a bad review for a book, movie, or Vam scene is an infringement on the authors free speech, rather than an expression of the reviewers free speech, is some dystopian Orwellian nightmare shit!
