Search results for query: *

The server doesn't keep activity history that long, so there's no way to definitively check at this point. I'll keep a lookout for any other obvious signs of an issue.

They are from 2023. This is 2024. *EDIT* Ohhhhh yeah. Gotcha. sorry.

Epi hasn't been on the Hub since before you posted that screenshot.

That user did not leave a reaction.

We haven't had any other reports of this happening. Once a reaction has been removed by the original user who left the reaction, we have no way to see it. I have no way to verify how many reactions were there before, unfortunately. Possibly if you remember some of the other names of members...

We don't allow advertising of video content on the Hub, so unfortunately no in answer to the question about making a post linking to the video. Are your videos on the other sites free? Or are you selling them? If the video is free then why not use it in the description of your scene? If the...

There is no situation where an 'NC' licensed asset can be used "by anyone". The purpose and point of the non-commercial license is to prevent people from doing exactly what you suggest, for example creating video content without the written consent of the original content author. If you wish...

It cannot be used without written permission. Part of our duty as moderators is to try to enforce this policy. We rely on the community to help us by submitting reports. If you feel the resource you linked is violating our policies on NC content, please report it.

Yes, our update yesterday fixed several bugs. Notes are in the #hub-feedback channel on Discord. We also added a duplicate file validation to prevent accidental duplicate file uploads.

In testing, it looks like this only occurs on paid resources, but I have confirmed it is related to the images.

Unfortunately yes, the duplicate filename screening is site-wide, and includes images. This is probably causing the error you're seeing. We'll see if we can tweak it on the next update.

As best as I can tell, it looks like something weird happened back in 2021 when you originally posted the Tisha Model resource. At exactly the same time, bigcat posted "Pricess Bubble Yum Rework". In the database, your version 1 of Tisha Model has the username "bigcat" and the title "Pricess...

It is likely that that creator has uploaded one or more of your vars. I will investigate.

There is a version freeze on VaM 1.x while we focus on VaM 2 development.

You seemed to have answered your own question, but if a plugin uses a morph (timeline, logic bricks, expression tool, etc) then that morph becomes part of your dependencies. Try the Var Inspector to determine where these dependencies are in your scene.

Update: The official decision is that we will allow "Questionable" or "MISSING" dependencies in Paid content but only if they are already hosted on the Hub and only if they are not from a banned creator. We will release another update to Var Health Check which will ignore "Questionable" or...

The issue isn't permission, the issue is that often those authors have hidden commercial content in their .var, or gotten parts of the .var from pirate websites, which is why the license says "Questionable" or "MISSING". If you aren't keeping track of where you got your content, this can...

My apologies, I see you were talking about the Paid category. Still, "MISSING" or "Questionable" dependencies were never allowed in the Paid category, and now the system detects them automatically. Please contact the author and ask them to update their resource with the correct license.

This error usually has to do with how you packaged the .var. It's not a bug. Previously, if you uploaded a package that failed to unpack on the server, the system would save your resource anyway even though there would be errors with your dependencies and other issues. Now, it correctly gives...

This bug is fixed as of now.