Benchmark Result Discussion

VaM continues to urge me to upgrade my system, so here I am with a new 5080 benchmark!

Previous benchmarks:
- Intel i7-9700k + Nvidia 3080Ti
- AMD 7700X + Nvidia 3080Ti
- AMD 7800X3D + Nvidia 3080Ti
- AMD 7800X3D + Nvidia 5080 <- you are here



I am very happy with the results and feel like this configuration will serve me well until VaM 2.0 gets released. Or until I develop a kink for Chewbacca, curse those expensive hair physics..

I was looking for an upgrade from my 3080 FE 10gb. Confused between 9070xt or 5070ti. Can someone tell which one is better in VAM.

ngagnu said:

I was looking for an upgrade from my 3080 FE 10gb. Confused between 9070xt or 5070ti. Can someone tell which one is better in VAM.

Click to expand...

5070ti in VR

Here are my values with my new PC.

The RAM runs with DDR5-6000, CL30-40-40-76

The processor has “PBO Curve Optimizer -20mv” in the mainboard settings.
This means it gets a little less power, but only gets a maximum of 80°C under full load.

I hope the values achieved here are okay for the hardware...

This is a resume of the previous 13 pages for VR:


CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
GPU: RTX 5090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 102-300 (VirtualDesktop Only)
FPS: 70-130 (SteamVR)
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 5090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 77-160
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 4090
RAM: 32GB
FPS: 76-150
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
GPU: RTX 4090
RAM: 32GB
FPS: 72-161
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 5090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 68-87
----------------

CPU: Intel i5-13600KF
GPU: RTX 5090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 67-165
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 5080
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 58-137
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 5080
RAM: 32GB
FPS: 60-100
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
GPU: RTX 4090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 49-150
FPS: 56-136 (patched)
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 5090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 45-98
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 4090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 45-56
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
GPU: RTX 4070ti
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 44-134
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
GPU: RTX 4070ti
RAM: 32GB
FPS: 43-113
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RX 9070 XT
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 40
----------------

CPU: Intel i5-13600KF
GPU: RTX 4090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 33-77
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 3090
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 30
----------------

CPU: Intel i5-9400F
GPU: RTX 2070
RAM: 48GB
FPS: 20-41
----------------

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
GPU: RTX 3080
RAM: 64GB
FPS: 17-60
----------------

CPU: Intel i7-6700K
GPU: GTX 1660 SUPER
RAM: 16GB
FPS: 14-34
----------------


CONCLUSIONS (?)
AMD is better than Intel? and Ryzen 7 7800X3D is very similar to Ryzen 7 9800X3D
What about Ryzen 7 vs 9? ( X3D version is important I think)
I couldn't find too many tests with Intel in VR

5090 vs 4090 is +50%? (for some tests the boost is not so high, why?)
5080 similar to 4090 (4090 +10%?)

CPU patch is getting +10/15%?

VirtualDesktop Only (without steamVR) makes a big difference?

RAM 32vs64 no big difference


Is there any relation between Desktop and VR FPS? because there are no so many VR tests, maybe we can apply some factor to the Desktop test? is it 0.5*Desktop?

@MacGruber said: the Benchmark is not really suited anymore for current high-end PCs? why is that?
Are the scenes from VAM now much more demanding? what type of scene could be that (maybe there is some example in the hub to test that?)

CPU OC'd to ~ 5.2 mhz, RAM @ 5600 mhz, GPU stock (straight out of the box)... this 5090 Suprim is a monster. Will run again after I turn on nvidia auto-OC in their app, see if it makes much difference.

Also ran (same settings as last post) but using VaM settings where I typically have them... not too shabby.

5060ti 16 GB not terrible but leaves a lot. The16 GB of vram is nice but load times seem longer this (PNY) is the only 5060ti 16GB actually at MSRP $430.

+40 fps -2ms physics with patch. No additional OC over whatever factory added.
Previous 3060ti

henshin said:

@MacGruber said: the Benchmark is not really suited anymore for current high-end PCs? why is that?
Are the scenes from VAM now much more demanding? what type of scene could be that (maybe there is some example in the hub to test that?)

Click to expand...

At those super high FPS values some people get you just measure noise. Benchmark probably needs a version that runs with 120Hz physics (instead of 60) for an more even CPU load. Also scenes with more characters, since scenes with a single character do not create enough load. Of course the issue is that when you got multiple versions of the benchmark, results are not comparable anymore.