Plugins + Scripts Realistic Foreskin & Erection Simulation

[FCG]

Its definitely much more than you mention. Its not just "triggering orgasm" (it is e.g. in sync with configurable sequences, facial animations, throbbing, it uses fluids presets, precum, cum cloth etc.). The same is true for pubic hair: There is an auto hide routine which hides altfuta penis and pubic hair when under clothing, and Divining Rod is considerably improved compared to the old original. These are just a few examples... Its difficult to briefly describe all functionalities inside the UI because of space restrictions, but I try to keep it very stringent and clean.

I agree though that the idles are off topic - I might separate them sometime.

If you just need the basics, leave the ControlCenter away and use foreskin and/or erection plugins alone. I am not planning to remove other main functions in the future, and this suite (tje ControlCenter in particular) will strive to be a male one stop solution!

My bad, I didn't take a closer look at some of the features since I don't need them
Trying to be a one stop do-it-all solution instead of doing one thing and doing it well is the same fate some of the other plugins on this site suffered but it is what it is

Best of luck and fun with the plugin

 

[RunRudolf]

I raised the issue of CPU single-core performance because I couldn't determine whether it was a problem with the VAM program itself or with the plugins.

I tried with another scene of G&C (Office Seduction, I don't have the exact one you mention) which includes my plugin, both with the .77 and .103 versions and without it. I do not notice any relevant fps difference, its stable at around 130 fps, and GPU load is also stable at 95% with and without the plugins. Must be some particular effect you observe, very difficult to narrow down from here. I am sorry for not being able to help you!

 

[exax]

I tried with another scene of G&C (Office Seduction, I don't have the exact one you mention) which includes my plugin, both with the .77 and .103 versions and without it. I do not notice any relevant fps difference, its stable at around 130 fps, and GPU load is also stable at 95% with and without the plugins. Must be some particular effect you observe, very difficult to narrow down from here. I am sorry for not being able to help you!

Thank you for your help.
I reinstalled VAM, scenes, and dependencies, and found no issues.
After comparing, I discovered that the original "vammoan.22" plugin in the AddonPackages was a third-party modified version. Only when using this third-party version of vammoan alongside realistic-foreskin would the GPU utilization drop below 50%. Later, I tested this third-party vammoan plugin on other scenes and found similar issues in some cases.
My conclusion is that realistic-foreskin triggered a bug in the third-party modified vammoan. Now I decided to delete the third-party modified vammoan to solve the problem.

 

[RunRudolf]

Thank you for your help.
I reinstalled VAM, scenes, and dependencies, and found no issues.
After comparing, I discovered that the original "vammoan.22" plugin in the AddonPackages was a third-party modified version. Only when using this third-party version of vammoan alongside realistic-foreskin would the GPU utilization drop below 50%. Later, I tested this third-party vammoan plugin on other scenes and found similar issues in some cases.
My conclusion is that realistic-foreskin triggered a bug in the third-party modified vammoan. Now I decided to delete the third-party modified vammoan to solve the problem.

Thanks for your feedback! Thats interesting! Is this alternative VAMMoan publicly available? I would like to find out what creates this effect...