Following up with my wish to post content here in a lawful and respectful manner, I referred to the content guidelines and found some stuff that for me was hard to understand:
User Contributions (from here on just UC for shorts) must NOT:
9.1 Contain any material that is defamatory, libelous, obscene, indecent, abusive, offensive, harassing, violent, hateful, inflammatory, or otherwise objectionable.
ok... obscene, indecent, violent... we're doing pornography here! how does this apply and to which extent? I thought we were ok with some choking and spanking, seeing by some of the available content but...
9.3 Depict or portray incest, rape or nonconsensual sex, extreme violence, torture, nonconsensual pain, blood, cutting, erotic asphyxiation, torture, necrophilia, genital mutilation, bestiality, urination, defecation, enema play, vomiting, or menstrual bleeding;
so this clears up a few doubts. violence is ok under the premise of consensual pain that is not extreme. at least from what I can extrapolate, but I shouldn't have to do it, it should be clear...
So what is erotic asphyxiation exactly? choking? scarfing? that doesn't seem ok in the context of sex/pornography. Not to mention that there are scenes/poses which at least suggest choking.
9.5 Constitute involuntary or revenge pornography (that is photographs, videos, or digital images of a person in a state of nudity or engaged in any act of sexual conduct, taken or posted without that person’s permission);
Here I understand that no characters should purposely use the likeness and/or Identity of real people. Which raises another question: if I use a pornstar's likeness, BUT NOT name and other personal infos I won't be comitting a crime, right? because let's be honest: who never used real pictures as reference?
If we read everything in this point literally, I could post a real person's model as long as it isn't naked or sexually portrayed. I don't know, there's a Mia Khalifa preset for mostly every AAA game with customization and no one seems to shut those down, no matter how viral they go.
9.7 Violate the legal rights (including the rights of publicity and privacy) of any person or contain any material that could give rise to any civil or criminal liability under governing laws or otherwise may be in conflict with this agreement or the Privacy Policy.
but the moral here is, whatever real people you are replicating at home, don't bring them to the internet. things have the potential to blow up out of proportion, and next thing you know, the cops are at your door. I still think that the lookalike approach works best. yes they look the same, no they're not representative of each other.
User Contributions (from here on just UC for shorts) must NOT:
9.1 Contain any material that is defamatory, libelous, obscene, indecent, abusive, offensive, harassing, violent, hateful, inflammatory, or otherwise objectionable.
ok... obscene, indecent, violent... we're doing pornography here! how does this apply and to which extent? I thought we were ok with some choking and spanking, seeing by some of the available content but...
9.3 Depict or portray incest, rape or nonconsensual sex, extreme violence, torture, nonconsensual pain, blood, cutting, erotic asphyxiation, torture, necrophilia, genital mutilation, bestiality, urination, defecation, enema play, vomiting, or menstrual bleeding;
so this clears up a few doubts. violence is ok under the premise of consensual pain that is not extreme. at least from what I can extrapolate, but I shouldn't have to do it, it should be clear...
So what is erotic asphyxiation exactly? choking? scarfing? that doesn't seem ok in the context of sex/pornography. Not to mention that there are scenes/poses which at least suggest choking.
9.5 Constitute involuntary or revenge pornography (that is photographs, videos, or digital images of a person in a state of nudity or engaged in any act of sexual conduct, taken or posted without that person’s permission);
Here I understand that no characters should purposely use the likeness and/or Identity of real people. Which raises another question: if I use a pornstar's likeness, BUT NOT name and other personal infos I won't be comitting a crime, right? because let's be honest: who never used real pictures as reference?
If we read everything in this point literally, I could post a real person's model as long as it isn't naked or sexually portrayed. I don't know, there's a Mia Khalifa preset for mostly every AAA game with customization and no one seems to shut those down, no matter how viral they go.
9.7 Violate the legal rights (including the rights of publicity and privacy) of any person or contain any material that could give rise to any civil or criminal liability under governing laws or otherwise may be in conflict with this agreement or the Privacy Policy.
but the moral here is, whatever real people you are replicating at home, don't bring them to the internet. things have the potential to blow up out of proportion, and next thing you know, the cops are at your door. I still think that the lookalike approach works best. yes they look the same, no they're not representative of each other.
