Search results for query: *

You'd want to ask a moderator directly https://hub.virtamate.com/members/?key=staff_members

Sometimes the resource isn't deleted, it depends on whether the resource violated some policy or license terms, and whether the banned user has requested their stuff to be removed. When I created this thread, the direct link to e.g. SPQR's Alive still worked but you couldn't find it using the...

Currently a banned user's profile cannot be opened, and the search functionality doesn't suggest banned users when typing in their name to the user name filter. However banned users can still have resource pages that exist and can be navigated to by direct link. It would be useful to be able to...

Possibly a not yet known issue? Quoted from this this thread.

No, that was unrelated.

It might. A dedicated issues tab would make it transparent to everyone what issues have been reported, and that could make it harder for creators to ignore the reported issues. Few people will be aware of issues buried in some post in the discussion thread, far more people will be aware of...

It would be great to have a dedicated section for users to report issues and the creator to respond to and manage them. For plugins, that would mean bug reports, but it could be useful for other resource types as well, such as packaging issues with scenes or looks, errors that pop up when...

I reran the debate through ChatGPT to see if I got the same analysis as you did regarding all that BS about instigating, underhanded tactics, nitpicking etc. I simply gave it the entire debate from start to finish, clearly indicated which person was posting what, and asked it to analyze it...

Here's what ChatGPT thinks of using ChatGPT in the way you've done: Prompt: Response:

Let's all start using AI as a "get out of jail free card" the moment we can't produce an intelligent response on our own. 🤣 Ridiculous. Regardless of whatever your AI overlord is telling you, all of the points I raised still stand. I also fully and completely refute the idea that I'm acting in...

I'm not sure if you actually regret it, but okay. All of the points I made still stand. I understand if you don't want to take the time to go through them, that's up to you.

I'm sad to see developments like this where in order to prevent a feature's potential misuse by a very small fraction of bad actors, it must be handicapped in this way. It's not a good direction. Just ban them then? Creators can already engage in the sort of fraud you're describing, padding...

The new Dependency Usage feature (which has yet to be officially announced at the time of writing this) is a great new way to discover content. However, it unfairly punishes the discoverability of the creator's own resources relative to those of other creators because it doesn't show the...

When sorting by rating, resources with no ratings and resources with low ratings (1-3 stars) seem to get mixed up. In my opinion, resources with ratings should be listed first (according to ascending or descending), and resources without any ratings should be listed at the end. That way, you...

First off, redundant is good. It's good to have multiple ways to achieve the desired outcome. Users don't need to have only a single way to do things - avoiding redundancy is a design philosophy that applies well to the development of a codebase, but not so well to the UX of a website...

Hub If partial matches were returned, that would just enable one possible way to sort by relevance (% matched), but that is not the only way. An exact match in the title of a resource should be more relevant than an exact match in some forum post, for example. An exact match among the tags or...

The number of dependencies is currently shown in the navigation tab on the resource's page: The reason for showing them in the search results is the same reason they are shown in the navigation tab. So it would be helpful in the search results exactly the same way as it is currently helpful...

That'd work. Same info in the hub browser and on the web site. In my opinion the "VAR Packages: 2" row would only be shown if the number of packages > 1, and the "Dependencies: 17" row would only be shown if the number of dependencies > 0. And of course both of these would be shorthand for...

The same number is shown in the Dependencies tab on the resource page: That one doesn't handle the main var and secondary demo scene var separately either. Do you have a proposal for how that could be handled in both the tab label and the search/browsing results list?

Mockup: