I'm not good at English, so I may have misunderstood the expression, but I do not insist.
I have no problems with the perception of frank scenes, I'm just trying to attract attention to this confus: "sperm is not clothes"..
You could misunderstand me; I'm not perturbed about the close-up view of the pussy, I care about the presentability of this category
And I want to say: no one except us will take care of the appearance of the site, so if you imagine the window of a clothing store that way, then go ahead, don’t limit yourself to anything.
Since sperm is created as Clothing in VaM, it is Clothing in VaM and VaMHub. different from reality.
I think this example doesn't make sense because things in VaM and reality are different.
Added VaM's "Clothing" to "Other" category Confused users. For example, User thinks that it is not clothing in VaM and searches for Asset.
It's easiest to download from VaMHub's Clothing category and search for VaM's Clothing tab.
So the "Other" category is not appropriate.
I think that there should be a separate category that clearly shows that it is not soft content and that it is clothing.
Currently I shouldn't change Wet Clothing to "Other" category to avoid user confusion. VaM's Clothing should be published in the VaMHub's Clotting category.
I didn't want to limit your "self-expression" in any way..
But I really don’t understand: why make a special post for a small resource (it can be attach to looks, that you regularly release). Imagine what happens if I start for each item clothing or each preset, create a individual post ...
I keep my releases small so that users can install only what they need.
Also, if a lot of things are packed into one var, the resources that have not been updated will be downloaded again when updating, so the download size and the user's disk space will be wasted. . Also to avoid it.
Disk space isn't wasted in the end if users manually delete old versions of vars, but it seems a lot of people don't.
That's why the unit of release is small.
Wet cloths are created using presets to create variations, but when the user wants to wear multiple clothings, there is a problem that cannot be done.
Look and Hair are closely related, but Wet Clothing is not, so I don't think it's appropriate to put them together.
I agree, and therefore I perceive the category of clothes as "soft content", and if I give a link to it to someone, and he sees a close-up of a pussy instead of clothes ..
I think he just thinks VaM is like that. Actually it is. He doesn't think of VaMHub as Daz Studio.
VaMHub doesn't have a function to display soft content and non-soft content separately, so sexual expressions will inevitably appear in recommendations, so I think it's useless for us to do our best in the Clothing category.
Currently, VaM is made as a sex simulator, so there is no consideration for that.
If you give your opinion to VaM, it may be supported in the next version, and if you need that feature, I think you should give your opinion to VaM.
The fact is that I don't see a sex simulator in this sandbox. Usage VAM, can be much wider than a fuck simulator.
I have a similar opinion. It's not just a sex simulator, but I think its core function is to function as a sex simulator. Without this, it would be less different from Daz.
You are free to think so, but since VaM was created as a sex simulator, it is currently a sex simulator that can do many things.
I think VaM is also a great place to show clothes. The hair editor that uses particles is also wonderful because it can express various expressions like real hair. And sexual expression is also possible in the rules. It is also wonderful that a wide range of expressions is possible.
Wouldn't it be great to see it in VR!
So it's a shame that VaMHub doesn't have the ability to separate soft content from non-soft content. People like you who want soft content will feel uncomfortable.
Even if we do our best individually, it's not enough. Doing so will only add to the confusion.
Hope the feature is implemented.