I don't know how to respond to a licensing topic in a review. I don't know what the alternatives would be, other than not to post it at all, or post with an inappropriate license. It seems to me that anyone can enjoy a CC-BY-NC privately in their own scenes, or they could freely share CC-BY-NC creations on the Hub for others to enjoy at no cost, so in that regard CC-BY-NC can always be used in some manner. I fully support creators who make paid content, and I would not post reviews to such creators commenting that I cannot use their work and include it within free scenes on the Hub, because it seems obvious, and I don't want to put pressure on that creator to stop making paid content.
I haven't been able to use VAM as much lately, but I couldn't even spend a little time without commenting on this scene. The summit of your works on here. An excellent demo of your particles and also a peek inside the nature of reality. Thanks for making and uploading!
Absolute masterpiece with love for detail and awesome depth to the content. @LutherSlade 's original is easily one of my favorite, if not my favorite scene in VAM - And this re-interpretation is as amazing as the og one.
Both of ya'll should be a musthave sub for paid content imo
Awesome work, she's adorable. Unlike the basement troll who made the first review, I won't even complain about the very nice preview images on the page, that are not part of the very reasonably sized var..... smh