• Hi Guest!

    Please be aware that we have released another critical security patch for VaM. We strongly recommend updating to version 1.22.0.12 using the VaM_Updater found in your installation folder.

    Details about the security patch can be found here.

Recent content by turtlebackgoofy

  1. T

    Benchmark Result Discussion

    janie fails to load because of a race condition somewhere in the scene loading, but only occurs if a morph fails to load while the character is loading. You should get some error like "file could not be found .... xxx.vmi" or something. For me it was some weird unrelated .var that contained...
  2. T

    Benchmark Result Discussion

    90fps means 1000/90=11.1ms per frame. If your CPU finishes the physics in 3ms, your GPU has 8.1ms to render the scene to not exceed the budget for 90fps. If you have a slow CPU that finishes in 6ms, your GPU must finish all it's work in 5.1ms. So if you have a 7800x3d or 9800x3d with 6000MT/s...
  3. T

    Plugins + Scripts CPU Performance Patch (Up to 30% faster physics, up to 60% more FPS)

    no, this patch will just revert back to the old vam version, dont use it until I update it
  4. T

    Plugins + Scripts CPU Performance Patch (Up to 30% faster physics, up to 60% more FPS)

    since I dont have the source code of vam itself I just hotpatched the dlls and thats actually how I keep my code changes haha
  5. T

    Benchmark Result Discussion

    increasing resolution doesnt increase CPU load, but rendering same resolution in VR does. In VR unity has to render each frame twice for each eye, making twice the draw calls which cost CPU. So a CPU is kinda important for it to work well in VR.
  6. T

    Single Pass (instanced) VR Rendering

    Just checked the VAM2 alpha2 and it didn't have Single Pass VR Rendering enabled. I guess because it breaks all non-unity shaders and you get a grey screen on one eye and a black screen on the right eye for every shader used. What it does: In VR every frame needs to be rendered twice from two...
  7. T

    Plugins + Scripts CPU Performance Patch (Up to 30% faster physics, up to 60% more FPS)

    you are correct, documentation even states that you can assign 64 CPU cores. Beyond that you need to put the cores into groups and then assign groups of up to 64 cores each to threads.
  8. T

    Plugins + Scripts CPU Performance Patch (Up to 30% faster physics, up to 60% more FPS)

    no, since windows vista you can use more than 32 threads but you need to use another API to assign threads to cores above 32. Also some CPUs are on different NUMA cores and you need to be careful to not split workloads between different NUMAs. I didnt bother to use the other API since I cant...
  9. T

    Plugins + Scripts CPU Performance Patch (Up to 30% faster physics, up to 60% more FPS)

    windows only supports a 32bit mask, so 32 cores. Beyond that you need to use numa and a different API. I didnt expect anyone to have more than 32 cores to use vam since those CPUs have horrible single thread performance.
  10. T

    Benchmark Result Discussion

    Intel said that the new platform will be almost exactly the same performance as the last one, but at up to 50% less power usage. Ryzen 9950x3d might actually beat it once it's released in january
  11. T

    Plugins + Scripts CPU Performance Patch (Up to 30% faster physics, up to 60% more FPS)

    exactly as predicted, thanks for confirming my predictions of the X3D-Cache
  12. T

    Benchmark Result Discussion

    8000MT/s ram, sheesh, that's not possible on AMD
Back
Top Bottom